April 1, 2014 § 3 Comments
Being the CEO of a start-up is fun. Being evil and mischievous is fun. Completely destroying one’s life dream is fun. However, reaching expertise in all three requires considerable subtlety. Here are a few notes for the day I decide to become an evil mischievous start-up CEO.
- I will keep in mind that my main currencies are time and credibility, both inside and outside my startup. Therefore, I will make my best to maintain that credibility and save that time.
- For this reason, although I pay them, I will describe my employees as trusted colleagues. I will, however, treat them as incompetent children.
- Conversely, to ensure credibility, I will encourage my trusted colleagues to worship me.
- For some reason, my relationship with trusted colleagues tends to alter when trusted colleagues realize that I lie to them. Which is why I will use threats and dissimulation to ensure that they do not.
- Being worthy of worship, I am the sole holder of the truth. Consequently, everything I have just told my investors or prospects is true. Trusted colleagues who fail to base their reality upon my truth will be punished.
- I will have trusted advisors, be they COO, CTO, CSO, CFO, GPU, tech leads, mentors, janitors, nannies or anything else. Listening to them is important. However, I know better, so there is no need to take anything they say into account.
- Being a CEO is all about taking decisions quickly. For this reason, I will avoid smoking pot or drinking alcohol. I will remain on coke.
- One of the roles of my trusted advisors is to help me differentiate the real world from my imagination. Do they wonder aloud whether my Reality Adjustment Factor is misaligned? Well, that is the sign that I should put them on coke, too.
- I will realize that some of my trusted advisors might be polite. Therefore, if one of them asks “er… are you really, really sure?”, I will take this as a hint that they may be politely inquiring about my being high on LSD. Since I am actually high on coke, there is nothing to worry about.
- If I have to divide my start-up in teams, I can ensure that teams can work in complement of each other. Of course, I can also ensure that teams will be at each other’s throat, which is much more amusing, especially if I live in a country where pitbull fighting is illegal. If I do organize my start-up as a pitbull fighting ring, this will, of course, open the possibility of taking bets to determine which team goes down first.
- Nothing motivates trusted colleagues quite as much as calling their colleagues “stupid”, “lazy” or “incompetent”, except perhaps calling them “stupid”, “lazy” or “incompetent” within earshot of said colleagues.
- Also, nothing motivates trusted colleagues quite as much as non-existent deadlines for imaginary clients on fabulous contracts. My trusted colleagues will be permitted to thank me for such managerial prowesses.
- I will claim that Microsoft, or Google, or Mozilla, or Apple, or Amazon, or Facebook, are a bunch of incompetent morons. They merely got to #1 in their respective sectors while I intend to do nothing less than revolutionize the world!
- In the spirit of encouraging team work, I will occasionally let a trusted colleague put his/her name along with mine as a co-author/inventor/creator of the work they have done. This way, in case of problem, it will be easy to find someone to take the blame.
- I could organize my company so that decisions are taken at the appropriate level by my trusted colleagues. However, this is clearly inefficient, so all decisions, no matter how small, must go through me. Should this be tiresome, I reserve the right to turn off my cellphone while I sip a Piña Colada in the sun.
- I realize that some of my trusted colleagues will be better than me at something. With time, many might end up better than me at most things. I could save face by deciding to take this as a proof of my recruiting skills, but this is hardly as satisfying as belittling their achievements and skills and then firing them.
- If I need to get rid of one of my trusted colleagues, I will have three options. The first one is to offer conditions to that trusted colleague for leaving. The second one is to fire the trusted colleague. The last one is to mount a cabal inside my start-up to get that trusted colleague to leave in disgust. The cabal-oriented solution will prove much more diverting, as I will be able to watch the cascade of consequences, plots and counter-plots, the consequent loss of time, productivity and morale, and I will be able to find out just exactly how much a lawyer charges for defending my company in court.
- At some point, my dream project will near completion. By then, I will have dreamed up tons of new features, and it only makes sense to start piling them up until requirements dwarf what has been realized so far. My trusted colleagues will certainly complete these final few features in a matter of days. Additionally, by the time my trusted colleagues are done, I can certainly have dreamed up a few new features. Ain’t that great?
- Also, a project approaching completion signals that I can reassign everybody to another project. The project will certainly find a way to finish itself.
- It may happen that my project cannot have all of the following features: working, released, everything I dreamed it to be. The first two features are not really important, so I can remove either.
- If a project has failed, or if the company has pivoted, I will inform my trusted employees. Of course, I might decide to keep the news for after the end of an ongoing death-march-to-finish-the-project-in-emergency. Just imagine the look on their face.
- This is also true for my commercially-oriented trusted colleagues. Just imagine them telling to their prospects that everything they have promised until this date is false.
- As a CEO, I will be approached by countless people with ideas. With a little effort, this will give me the opportunity to pivot as often as twice a week. My trusted colleagues need the exercise.
- Being an avid Mac user, I can do as well as Steve Jobs. Even better, being a Facebook user, I can also do as well as me Mark Zuckerberg. Where else could you find a CEO as exceptional as me?
- I will occasionally take breaks, or even vacations. Whenever I do go on vacation, however, I will make sure to keep this a secret. Just think how funny it will be when they realize how much time they have wasted coming by every few minutes to check if I had arrived in the office.
- While this is my company, not all trusted colleagues may realize that its money is mine to use as I see fit and that I can invest it in my luxury vacations. Some of them might conclude that I am abusing everybody’s trust, work and livelihood. The simplest solution is to fire them, but I should check with a lawyer whether I could also sue them.
- While I may have to lie to potential clients and investors, I will refrain from lying to (alleged) mobsters and secret services. My health matters too much to me.
- Also, should I be faced with (alleged) mobsters and secret services, and should I determine that the people in front of me are morons and/or easy milk cows, I will refrain from making this realization obvious to said idiots.
- Some of my colleagues will insist that we should not release a product that we have not tested. If they refuse to use our product because they hate it, it means that the product is ready for release. If I refuse to use our project because I hate it, it means that we should restart from scratch, re-implement everything in two weeks, then fire my trusted colleagues.
- From time to time, I will feel like taking a scapegoat among my trusted colleagues, because this is a cheap way to vent out frustration at failed projects or meetings. After all, there is no way said trusted colleague could figure out that competition would pay more and grab the experience gained at my company.
- If I attempt to enter a market saturated of products that are free-to-use and just as good as mine – possibly even dominated by Google, Microsoft, Apple or Mozilla – my investors and trusted colleagues should not worry, as I have a secret weapon: I am the smartest person in the world.
- If my product requires that user give up on their existing data, about their existing code, about their existing infrastructure, I will not be too surprised when users rather decide to give up on my product. That is because users are stupid.
- If potential users start describing my sole product as vaporware, I can just retort that Microsoft got around with delivering vaporware for more than 10 years. Of course, Microsoft got to #1 before doing so, but we are almost there ourselves.
- Occasionally, I will make mistakes and choose wrong paths for my company. The most amusing manner of getting away with mistakes is to pretend that my trusted colleagues have disobeyed me and taken bad initiatives. Doing so is, of course, a mistake and places the company on a wrong path, which makes things recursively more amusing .
- My trusted colleagues will often be occupied with non-productive trivialities such as building my product, signing paychecks or hunting for clients. I will have to remind them regularly that I am the sole efficient worker in this company.
- As my Reality Distortion Field can tell you, there is no difference between “clients”, “contacts” and “people who have looked at the website”. For instance, if our website gets 30,000 hits per month (or per day), we surely have 30,000 paying users.
- Occasionally, my trusted colleagues will reach milestones, possibly even releasable/deployable versions of our product. These milestones/versions will probably not match my dream ideas. The simplest way to deal with such imperfections is to treat these unworthy versions with disgust, refuse to give them a name or number and retroactively add some set of features that must absolutely be completed before the milestone is hit.
- Occasionally, I will be unhappy with some of my trusted colleagues, but not sufficiently to fire them. I will assigning them to a punishment project, designed solely for maximal pain. That will teach them!
- If one of my projects succeeds, I will know – and remind everybody – that I am the sole reason for this success.
- If one of my ideas succeeds, I will attempt to remember if, by any chance, one of my trusted colleagues may have spent some time attempting to convince me that this was a good idea, before this was my idea. If so, I will make sure that he/she understand how the first idea was bad and mine was a stroke of genius. If this is not sufficient, I will fire him/her.
- My main argument for selling to potential clients will be that they have been idiots to not use my product/service. With my help, however, they can become intelligent enough to know that they should buy my wares. Am I not generous?
- Although I may not have heard of weird concepts such as revision control systems, bug trackers or customer relationship managers, if one of my trusted colleagues informs me that they cannot work without such exotic software, I will simply dismiss my trusted colleague as incompetent. After all, I could do the work without such niceties, so they cannot be really useful, can they?
- Once I know of weird concepts such as revision control systems, bug trackers or customer relationship managers, I should probably build one. After all, how hard can it be? Additionally, I am so much smarter than everybody who has built one before us. The world will be so grateful that they will beg to use our product, once we have gotten around to building it.
- Should I decide that we need to reinvent yet another revision control systems, bug tracker or customer relationship managers and to use it, I will make sure that the product is tested, at least marginally, before it hosts our critical data. Of course, if my trusted colleagues insist that the product does not work, there is always time to ignore their feedback. Otherwise, how could I watch the revision control system lose all the source code of the revision control system?
- Should investors ever decide to audit my company with the perspective of buying it, I will adjust my Reality Perception Filter to ensure that the esteemed idiots rake. This will, of course, not prevent me from complaining to my trusted colleagues that all this work was for naught and for so little money. I would not want them to waste their health by envying me too much.
- Of course, to ensure credibility, I will make sure that said trusted colleagues will not receive one cent from the sale. Their health really is that important to me.
- As my company will undoubtedly be #1 soon, I will make sure that my salary corresponds to that rank. Unfortunately, trusted colleagues will have to satisfy themselves with salaries slightly below the minimum wage, to ensure the survival of the company. Remember, we are just a start-up.
- I might I come from a commercial background, but I know technical matters better than my trusted technical colleagues. After all, I know Excel.
- I might I come from a technical background, but I know commercial matters better than my trusted commercial colleagues. After all, I know Excel.
- It is a well-known fact that trusted colleagues are wimps and that they burnout faster than matches. I will keep vigilant for such occurrences, not only because it is fun to watch one trusted colleague turn into an improductive bag of nerves that the mere mention of my name will send into fits of dementia, but also because with the proper balance of (mis)management, such burnouts can propagate faster than forest fires.
Thanks for the contributions of Team TGCM, Team Malsain, Team Dixous, Team HokutoNoOpa. No animals were hurt in the process, but I intend to remedy this in part 2, to be released soon.
October 13, 2011 § 4 Comments
A few weeks ago, the browser and web development communities started wondering about this mysterious new web language that Google was about to unveil: Dart. Part of the interrogation was technical – what would that language look like? how would a new language justify its existence? what problems would it solve? – and part was more strategic – what was Google doing preparing a web language in secret? where the leaked memos that seemed to imply a web-standards-breaking stance something that Google would indeed pursue? was Google trying to solve web-related problems, Google-related problems or Oracle-related problems?
Now, Google has unveiled the specifications of Dart, as well as library documentation. Neither will be sufficient to answer all questions, but they give us an opportunity to look at some of the technical sides of the problem. As a programming language researcher/designer and a member of the web browser community, I just had to spend some quality time with the Dart specifications.
So, how’s Dart? Well, let’s look at it.
What Dart is
Dart is a programming language and a Virtual Machine. As a programming language, Dart positions itself somewhere in the scope between scripting/web development and application development. From the world of application development, Dart brings
- clean concurrency primitives that would feel at home in Scala, Clojure or Erlang – including a level of concurrent error reporting;
- a clean module mechanism, including a notion of privacy;
- a type system offering genericity, interfaces and classes;
- compilation and a virtual machine;
- a library of data structures;
- no eval();
- data structures that do not change shape with time.
From the world of scripting/web development, Dart brings:
- usability in any standards-compliant browser, without any plug-in (although it will work better in a plug-in and/or in Chrome);
- DOM access;
- emphasis on fast start-up;
- a liberal approach to typing (i.e. types are optional and the type system is incorrect, according to the specifications);
- dynamic errors;
- closures (which are actually not scripting/web development related, but until Java 8 lands or until Scala, F# or Haskell gain popularity, most developers will believe that they are).
Where Dart might help
Web development has a number of big problems. I have
trolled written about some of them in previous posts, and Dart was definitely designed to help, at least a little.
Safety and Code Hygiene
Where Dart might hinder
The single biggest problem with Dart is, of course, its source. To get the VM in the browsers, Google will have to convince both developers and other browser vendors to either reimplement the VM by themselves or use a Google-issued VM. This is possible, but this will be difficult for Google.
The vendor controlled vehicle will be to integrate the VM in Chrome and Android and encourage developers targeting the Chrome Market and Android Market to use Dart. Some speculate that this is a manner for Google to get rid of the Java dependency on the Android Market. In this case, of course, there will be little competition.
Libraries and documentation
Doing it without Dart
Also, while classes and private fields are probably the least surprising techniques for application developers coming to the web, developers used to dynamic or functional languages know that closures and prototypes are essentially equivalent. So, this is essentially a matter of taste.
Isolates are nice. Workers are nice. Isolates are a little easier to set-up, so I would like to see an Isolate-like API for Workers. Other than that, they are essentially equivalent.
String interpolations are nice to have, but not really life-altering. If necessary, they can trivially be implemented by a pre-processor. CoffeeScript might already do it, I’m not sure. Adding this to the JS standard might be tricky, for reasons of backwards compatibility, but there is not much to it.
If we consider I my opinion, there are three ways that Google can get Dart adopted on the web:
- make it the default choice for Android & Chrome development;
- provide a set of killer libraries for the web, that work on all browsers but are truly usable only with Dart (DirectX anyone? something Cocoa-style, perhaps?);
- spend Google-sized budgets on adoption (PR, marketing, GSoC, open-source projects, etc.).
September 6, 2011 § 6 Comments
Tides come and tides go.
Two years ago, I accepted to join MLstate, to take lead of the R&D group, and turn Opa from a promising early-stage demo into a world-class technology. And I am happy to say that we succeeded. Certainly, there are still many things that we would like to improve in Opa, but looking back on those two years, I am proud of the work we have accomplished, of the number of topics upon which we have pushed forward the state of the art, and even of many of the mistakes we have made, because they have expanded our understanding so much.
Now, after two years at MLstate, I am leaving. Our work is accomplished and I do not feel that I can contribute in any meaningful way to what MLstate has now become, nor that today’s MLstate can keep me excited and interested any longer. In the past few days, Opa has been featured on Lambda the Ultimate, on Hacker News and on Slashdot. Small and large high-tech companies have tried and enjoyed the technology. What better time than this to set sail and say goodbye to these two exciting years of my life?
As of today, I am not the Head of Research & Development, Chief Scientific Officer or Technological Evangelist at MLstate anymore. I will keep a distant eye on Opa, but I will not design or supervise its future versions. Mathieu Baudet, our COO, is replacing me as the supervisor for the development of Opa, while Adam Koprowski is replacing me as Technological Evangelist. Mathieu is a very intelligent security researcher and I am sure that he will impose a new style to the Opa team, and Adam is a bright and enthusiastic researcher/developer, and certainly the best person at MLstate to carry on Opa advocacy.
I would like to thank my University for supporting this foray into the exciting world of start-ups. I would like to thank our CEO for recruiting such a talented team. I would also like to thank Mehdi Ben Soltane, our CFO/HR director, who managed to do his job with a nice and welcome pinch of humor, even in the toughest of times. And mostly, I would like to thank all the R&D team: Maxime Audouin, Mathieu Barbin, Vincent Benayoun, Anthonin Bonnefoy, Raja Boujbel, Quentin Bourgerie, Sébastien Briais, Valentin Gatien-Baron, Louis Gesbert, Nicolas Glondu, Hugo Heuzard, Adrien Jonquet, Mikolaj Konarski, Adam Koprowski, Laurent LeBrun, Sarah Maarek, Grégoire Makridis, François Pessaux, Guillem Rieu, Pascal Rigaux, Norman Scaife, Rudy Sicard, François-Régis Sinot, Cédric Soulas, Quickie Squeaky, Hugo Venturini, Frédéric Ye, and all our successive generations of interns: you are the best team I have ever had the chance to join, it really was an honor and a pleasure working with you all and I hope that those among you who have chosen to remain in MLstate have as much fun working under Mathieu’s leadership as I had working with you all.
Time to set sail! My next missive should arrive from the next port.
 Sorry, I do not have the list of interns at hand. But do not worry, I enjoyed working with you, too :)
August 28, 2011 § Leave a comment
Opa advocacy and tutorials have moved to their own, dedicated blog. The topics are now covered by Adam Koprowski. Thanks for handling this, Adam!
August 28, 2011 § Leave a comment
There is a nice discussion on Opa on Lambda the Ultimate forums. If you are not familiar with Lambda the Ultimate, know that this is the place for discussing new and exotic programming languages and programming concepts, so the simple fact of seeing a thread on LtU is something of an honor for us.
Edit Added the Slashdot thread.
Edit Gasp, Slashdot is down. Hey, GeekNet, if you need a scalable programming language for the next version of Slashcode, just ping us :)
June 7, 2011 § Leave a comment
May 30, 2011 § 18 Comments
Feedback from Opa testers suggests that we can improve the syntax and make it easier for developers new to Opa to read and write code. We have spent some time both inside the Opa team and with the testers designing two possible revisions to the syntax. Feedback on both possible revisions, as well as alternative ideas, are welcome.
A few days ago, we announced the Opa platform, and I’m happy to announce that things are going very well. We have received numerous applications for the closed preview – we now have onboard people from Mozilla, Google and Twitter, to quote but a few, from many startups, and even from famous defense contractors – and I’d like to start this post by thanking all the applicants. It’s really great to have you guys & gals and your feedback. We are still accepting applications, by the way.
Speaking of feedback, we got plenty of it, too, on just about everything Opa, much of it on the syntax. This focus on syntax is only fair, as syntax is both the first thing a new developer sees of a language and something that they have to live with daily. And feedback on the syntax indicates rather clearly that our syntax, while being extremely concise, was perceived as too exotic by many developers.
Well, we aim to please, so we have spent some time with our testers working on possible syntax revisions, and we have converged on two possible syntaxes. In this post, I will walk you through syntax changes. Please keep in mind that we are very much interested in feedback, so do not hesitate to contact us, either by leaving comments on this blog, by IRC, or at email@example.com .
Important note: that we will continue supporting the previous syntax for some time and we will provide tools to automatically convert from the previous syntax to the revised syntax.
Let me walk you through syntax changes.
May 24, 2011 § Leave a comment
A few open-source Opa applications, written by beta testers or Opa team members, have been open-sourced in the past few days. Expect a few other releases in the upcoming days/weeks:
- OpaChat – simple real-time web chat (works)
- OpaStorage – simple distributed key/value store (works)
- opaCAS – single sign-on (in progress)
- Contre-Jour – thumbnail viewer (works)
- OpaTetris – I’m sure you can guess what it’s about – based on HTML5 canvas (works) :)
Know of any other open-source Opa app? Then let me know!
May 23, 2011 § 18 Comments
The Opa platform was created to address the problem of developing secure, scalable web applications. Opa is a commercially supported open-source programming language designed for web, concurrency, distribution, scalability and security. We have entered closed beta and the code will be released soon on http://opalang.org, as an Owasp project .
- Edit The video spawned a conversation on Reddit.
- Edit Interesting followup on Hacker News.
- Edit Reworked source code & comments for clarity. Thanks for the feedback.
- EditCome and chat with us on Freenode, channel #opalang .
If you are a true coder, sometimes, you meet a problem so irritating, or a solution so clumsy, that challenging it is a matter of engineering pride. I assume that many of the greatest technologies we have today were born from such challenges, from OpenGL to the web itself. The pain of pure LAMP-based web development begat Ruby on Rails, Django or Node.js, as well as the current NoSQL generation. Similarly, the pains of scalable large system development with raw tools begat Erlang, Map/Reduce or Project Voldemort.
Opa was born from the pains of developing scalable, secure web applications. Because, for all the merits of existing solutions, we just knew that we could do much, much better.
Unsurprisingly, getting there was quite a challenge. Between the initial idea and an actual platform lay blood, sweat and code, many experiments and failed prototypes, but finally, we got there. After years of development and real-scale testing, we are now getting ready to release the result.
April 18, 2011 § 104 Comments
No, really, there’s something deeply flawed with web development. And I’m not (just) talking browser incompatibilities, or Ruby vs. Java vs. PHP vs. anything else or about Flash or HTML5, I’m talking about something deeper and fundamental.
Edit Added TL;DR
Edit Added a comparison with PC programming.
Edit Added a follow up introducing the Opa project.
- Plenty of technologies somehow piled on top of each other.
- Dependency nightmare
- Documentation nightmare
- Scalability nightmare
- Glue nightmare
- Security nightmare
Just to clarify: None of these nightmares is about having to make choices.
- Single computer development had the same set of issues in the 80s-90s. They’re now essentially solved. Let’s do the same for the web.
Shop before you code
Say you want to write a web applications. If it’s not a trivial web application, chances are that you’ll need to choose:
- a programming language;
- a web server;
- a database management system;
- a server-side web framework;
- a client-side web framework.
And you do need all the above. A programming language, because you’re about to program something, so no surprise here. You also need a web server, because you’re about to write a web application and you need to deliver it, so again, no surprise.
A database management system, because you’ll want to save data and/or to share data, and it’s just too dangerous to access the file system. Strangely, though, your programming language will give you access to the file system, and it’s somewhere else, at the operating system layer, that you’ll have to restrict this. Now, depending on your application and your DBMS, your data may fit completely with the DBMS, but often, that’s not the case, because your application manipulates object-oriented data structures, while your DBMS manipulates either records and relations or keys and values. And at this stage, you have two possibilities: either you forcefeed your data into your database – essentially reinventing (de)serialization and storage on top of an antagonistic technology – or you add to your stack a form of Object Relational Manager to do this for you.
You need a server-side framework – perhaps more than one –, too, because, let’s face it, at this stage, your (empty) application already feels so complicated that you’ll need all the help you can get to avoid having to reinvent templating, POST/GET management, sessions, etc. Oh, actually, what I wrote above, that’s not quite true: depending on your framework, you may need some access to the file system for your images, your pages, etc. and all other stuff that may or may not fit naturally in the DBMS. So back to the OS layer to configure it more finely.
So, in addition to the first list, you probably have to choose and configure:
- an OS;
- OS-level security layers;
- an ORM (unless you’re reinventing yours) or an approximation thereof;
At this stage, you haven’t written “Hello, world” yet.
On the other hand, you’re about to enter dependency nightmare, because not all web servers fit with all frameworks, not all server-side frameworks with all client-side frameworks, or with all ORMs, or with all OSes, not to mention incompatibilities between OS and DBMS, etc. You also have entered documentation nightmare, because information on how to configure the security layers of your OS is marginal at best, and of course totally separate from information on how to configure your DBMS, or your ORM, or your frameworks, etc.
Note that I haven’t mentioned anything about scaling up yet, because the scaling nightmare would deserve a complete post.
Sure, you will solve all of these issues. You will handpick your tools, discard a few, and eventually, since you’re a developer (you’re a developer, right?), you’ll eventually assemble a full development platform in which every technology somehow accepts to talk to its neighbors. Heavens forbid that you make a mistake at that stage, because once you start with actual coding, there will be no coming back, but yes, you’re now ready to code.
At this stage, a few questions cross my mind:
- You have reached that stage, because you have the time and skills to do this, but what about Joe beginner? Do they deserve this?
- Remember that you haven’t written “Hello, world” yet. These hours of your life you have spent to get to this stage, do you have a feeling that they were well-spent?
- What if you made a mistake, i.e. what if something is subtly incompatible but you haven’t noticed yet, or if one of the technologies you’re using is deprecated, or doesn’t match your security policy, how much time will you spend rooting out all the stuff that’s hardwired with this technology?
So, yes, for all these reasons, I decree that web development is broken. But that’s not all there is to it.
So you have started coding. Good for you.
Now, you have a set of tools that should be sufficient to develop your application – again, possibly not for scaling it up, but that’s a different story. So, you can start coding.
Welcome to the third nightmare: the glue nightmare. What’s the glue? Well, it’s that sticky stuff that you put between two technologies that don’t know about each other, that don’t really fit with each other, but that you need to get working together.
You have data on the client and you want to send it to the server. Time to encode them as JSON or XML, send them with Ajax, open an Ajax entry point on the server (temporary? permanent?), parse the received data on the server (what do you do if it doesn’t parse?), decode the parsed data to your usual data structures, validate the values in these data structures (or should you have done that before decoding?), and then use them (I really hope that you have validated everything carefully). That was the easy part. Now, say you have data on the server and you want to send it to the client. Time to encode them as JSON or XML, send them with Comet – oops, there’s no such thing as “sending with Comet”, so you should open an Ajax entry point on the server (same one? temporary? permanent?) and let the client come and fetch the data (how do you ensure it’s the right client?). Plus the usual parsing and decoding. Except the server code you wrote for parsing and decoding doesn’t work in your browser. Plus, be careful with parsing, because you can get some nasty injections at that stage, or you can just crash a number of JS engines accidentally. Add a little debugging, some more work on garbage-collection and you can send “Hello” from the client to the server or from the server to the client.
Again, the question is not: “can you get this to work?” – I’m sure that you can, many of us do this on a regular basis. The questions are more:
- was this time well-spent?
- are you sure that it works?
- really, really sure?
- even if browsers can crash?
- even if users are malicious?
- how can you be certain?
The client-server glue doesn’t stop here – if only we were so luck. There’s more for handling forms or uploads, or to inject user-generated contents into pages, but let’s move to server-side glue.
Storage is full of glue, too. You have data that fits your application and you’ll want to send it to your DBMS. Now, either you’re using an ORM or you’re encoding the data manually in a manner that somehow fits your database paradigm. That’s already quite a sizable layer of glue, but that’s not all. Sending your application to your DBMS means opening a connection, somehow serializing your data (I hope it’s well-validated, too, just in case someone attempts to inject bogus database requests), somehow serializing your database request, handling random disconnections and sometimes unpredictable (de)serialization errors (by the way, I hope you made sure that the database could never be in an inconsistent state, even if the browser crashes), somehow (de)serializing database responses (can you handle the database not responding at all?) and reconnecting in case of disconnection. Oh, and since your database and your application are certainly based on distinct security paradigms, you’ll have to set up both your application security and your database security, and you’ll have to ensure that they work together. Did I mention handling distinct encodings? Ensuring that temporary bindings are never stored in the database? Performing garbage-collection in the database?
Glue doesn’t stop here, of course. Do I need to get started on REST or SOAP or WSDL?
Again, you’ll solve all these issues, eventually. But if you’re like me, you’ll wonder why you had to spend so much time on so little stuff. These are not features, they are not infrastructure, they are not fun, they’re just glue, to get a shamble of technologies – some of which date back to the 1970s – to work together.
Oh, and at this stage, chances are that you have plenty of security holes. Welcome to the security nighmare. Because your programming language has no idea that this piece of XML or JSON or string will end-up being displayed on a user’s browser (XSSi, anyone?) or stored in the database (SQLi or CouchDB injection, anyone?), or that this URI is actually a command with potentially dangerous side-effects (sounds like a XSRF), etc. By default, any web application is broken, security-wise, in dozens of ways. Most of the web application tutorials I’ve seen on the web contain major security holes. And that’s just not right. If you look at these security issues, you’ll realize that most of them are actually not in the features you coded, not even in the infrastructure you assembled, but in the glue itself. Worse than that: many of these issues are actually trivial things, that could be solve once and for all, but we are stuck using tools that don’t even attempt to solve them. So, chances are that in your application, no matter how good you are, you will forget to validate and/or escape data at least once, that you will forget to authenticate before giving access to one of your resources or that you will forget something that somehow will let a malicious user get into your app and cause all sorts of chaos.
I stand my case. Web development is broken.
History of brokenness
But if we look at it closer, a few years ago, so was PC development. Any non-trivial application needed:
- application-level code, of course;
- memory-level hackery just to get past the 640kb barrier (or, equivalently, the handle limitation under Windows – 64kb iirc);
- IRQ-level coding and/or Windows SDK-level coding (the first one was rather fun, the second was a complete nightmare, neither were remotely meant for anybody who was not seriously crazy);
- (S)VGA BIOS level hackery to get anything cool to display;
- BIOS-level fooling.
Five layers of antagonist technologies that needed to get hacked into compliance. The next generation was represented by the NeXT frameworks and attempts to bring the same amount of comfort to Windows-land (OWL, MFC, etc.). Still fragile and complex, but a huge improvement. And the next generation was Java/C#/Python programming. Nowadays, you can install/apt-get/emerge/port install your solution, start coding right away, and be certain that you have everything you need. Nightmare solved.
On the web, we’re still stuck somewhere between the first generation and the second. Why don’t we aim for the third?
A manifesto for web development that works
Time to stop the rant and start thinking positive. All the above is web development that’s broken. Now, what would not-broken web development look like?
Let’s go for the following:
I want to start coding now
- without having to learn configuration, dependencies or deployment;
I don’t want to write no glue
- the web is one platform, time to stop forcing us to treat it as a collection of heterogeneous components;
I don’t want to repeat myself
- so don’t force me to write several validators for the same data, or several libs that do the same thing in different components of my web application;
I don’t care about browser wars
- my standard toolkit must work on all browsers, end of the story;
Give me back my agility
- I want to be able to make important refactorings, to move code around the client, the server, the database component without having to rewrite everything.
Secure by default
- all the low-level security issues must be handled automatically and transparently by the platform, not by me. I’ll concentrate on the high-level application-specific issues.
All of this is definitely possible. So please give it to me this and you’ll make many much happier coders.
Disclaimer My company builds related technology. However, this blogs expresses my personal views.